Wiki source code of Expert opinion, and advisory services
Last modified by Sarantis Dimitriadis on 2023/05/30 18:41
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
4.2 | 1 | (% class="western" lang="en-GB" style="text-align:justify" %) |
| 2 | (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)**Description: **Expert(s) who have long-standing practical and/or scientific experience in the field of enquiry provide(s) a well-founded written or oral answer for your questions, including the ethics domain/ ethics guidelines, and offer(s) advisory services on the use of specific equipment. Expert(s) are discussing ideas and problems from a different angle to respectfully challenge, test and refine ideas (e.g. as devil´s advocate looking for problems). Qualified and traceable arguments in favor of and against a specific position in an applied issue to support decision-making and development activities. Professional work is a paid service, but “consultation” can be a free of charge service. In most cases it is done by Living Lab on its own, hosting organization personnel, subcontractor. | ||
 |
1.1 | 3 | |
| |
4.2 | 4 | (% class="western" lang="en-GB" style="text-align:justify" %) |
| |
5.2 | 5 | (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)**R&D service category-ies: **(%%)Project planning and management, Capacity building, Advisory services, Market and sales support |
| |
1.1 | 6 | |
| |
4.2 | 7 | (% class="western" lang="en-GB" style="text-align:justify" %) |
| 8 | (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)**Key characteristics in Living Lab context:** | ||
| |
1.1 | 9 | |
| |
4.2 | 10 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Typically consists of one-to-one relationship between the customer and the expert, but may include opinions from multiple experts. |
| 11 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Internal or external experts (local, national and international experts) | ||
| 12 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Multidisciplinary collaboration/Pool of experts | ||
| |
1.1 | 13 | |
| |
4.2 | 14 | (% class="western" lang="en-GB" style="text-align:justify" %) |
| 15 | (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)**Objectives:** | ||
| |
1.1 | 16 | |
| |
4.2 | 17 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Offer advice on** **UX or usability studies, |
| 18 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Consulting care solutions (ICT and devices), in specific/narrow fields in which Living Lab has experts (e.g., energy consumption calculations), | ||
| 19 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Consulting on consent and ethics requirement and processes, | ||
| 20 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Consulting technical solutions (ICT, medical and other devices, sensors, wearables, health apps, machine learning, medical engineering) | ||
| 21 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Consulting legal issues, networking and contacting people (e.g., doctors, academia, pharmacy, healthcare professionals, policy makers, local ecosystem actors), research ideas, | ||
| 22 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Innovation management, interventions, | ||
| 23 | * (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)Creation of training materials and processes | ||
| |
1.1 | 24 | |
| |
4.2 | 25 | (% class="western" lang="en-GB" style="text-align:justify" %) |
| 26 | (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)**Methods: **One to one and group** **discussion**, **advisory** **board, expert identification | ||
| |
1.1 | 27 | |
| |
4.2 | 28 | (% class="western" lang="en-GB" %) |
| 29 | (% lang="en-US" style="line-height:107%" %)**Tools/Online tools: **ethical tools, training materials |