Wiki source code of 4.4.9 Expert opinion, and advisory services
Version 1.1 by Evdokimos Konstantinidis on 2021/10/21 14:36
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
1.1 | 1 | **Description: **Expert(s) who have long-standing practical and/or scientific experience in the field of enquiry provide(s) a well-founded written or oral answer for your questions, including the ethics domain/ ethics guidelines, and offer(s) advisory services on the use of specific equipment. Expert(s) are discussing ideas and problems from a different angle to respectfully challenge, test and refine ideas (e.g. as devil´s advocate looking for problems). Qualified and traceable arguments in favor of and against a specific position in an applied issue to support decision-making and development activities. Professional work is a paid service, but “consultation” can be a free of charge service. In most cases it is done by living lab on its own or hosting organization personnel. |
| 2 | |||
| 3 | **R&D service categories: **All categories | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | **Key characteristics in living lab context:** | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | * Typically consists of one-to-one relationship between the customer and the expert, but may include opinions from multiple experts. | ||
| 8 | * Internal or external experts (local, national and international experts) | ||
| 9 | * Multidisciplinary collaboration/Pool of experts | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | **Objectives:** | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | * Offer advice on** **UX or usability studies, | ||
| 14 | * consulting care solutions (ICT and devices), in specific/narrow fields in which living lab has experts (e.g., energy consumption calculations), | ||
| 15 | * consulting on consent and ethics requirement and processes, | ||
| 16 | * consulting technical solutions (ICT, medical and other devices, sensors, wearables, health apps, machine learning, medical engineering) | ||
| 17 | * consulting legal issues, networking and contacting people (e.g., doctors, academia, pharmacy, healthcare professionals, policy makers, local ecosystem actors), research ideas, | ||
| 18 | * innovation management, interventions, | ||
| 19 | * creation of training materials and processes | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | **Methods: **one to one and group** **discussion**, **advisory** **board, expert identification | ||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | **Tools/Online tools: **ethical tools, training materials |